Receive weekly email reports, guides and templates. Includes topics from CSRD compliance, decarbonization playbooks up to certifications and communication.
The roll-out of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) marks a major milestone towards improving the quality of corporate sustainability information across Europe.
It also puts more than 50,000 companies into unfamiliar territory with its complex reporting requirements.
If your business is one of them, getting your head around the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) – including ESRS E4 on biodiversity and ecosystems – should be a top priority. Besides regulatory compliance, it's a powerful tool to shape a more sustainable future for your business and the planet.
But what exactly is ESRS E4 and why is it so important? What are its core requirements? And how can you implement ESRS E4 effectively? Read on for everything you need to know to manage this standard with confidence.
ESRS E4 focuses on biodiversity and ecosystems, highlighting their essential role in sustainability. Biodiversity supports critical ecosystem services like pollination, water purification, and climate regulation, yet it is under severe threat from deforestation, habitat destruction, overexploitation, and climate change. These pressures jeopardize both ecological health and economic stability.
ESRS E4 requires companies to report on their impacts and dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems, covering areas such as land use, habitat restoration, and species protection. This ensures alignment with global biodiversity goals while increasing transparency and accountability.
Ecosystem conservation is equally critical in ESRS E4, as healthy ecosystems sustain biodiversity and underpin resilience against environmental and economic risks. By addressing impacts and opportunities through ESRS E4, businesses can adopt sustainable practices, mitigate risks, and support global ecological goals.
To align ESRS 2 general disclosures with ESRS E4 for biodiversity and ecosystems, companies should focus on the following key areas belonging to ESRS 2:
This structured approach helps companies embed biodiversity into governance, strategy, and risk management, providing stakeholders with a comprehensive view of their environmental commitments.
Under ESRS E4-1, companies must disclose how biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks, and opportunities shape their strategy and business model. This disclosure demonstrates the resilience of their approach and its alignment with local, national, and global biodiversity goals.
Key elements to disclose include:
Companies may cross-reference disclosures with ESRS 2 SBM-3 if applicable and are encouraged to align their plans with frameworks like the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. This approach provides transparency on how biodiversity considerations integrate into long-term business planning.
Under SBM-3, companies must disclose how their operations impact biodiversity-sensitive areas. This includes providing a list of significant sites under operational control, detailing:
Companies must also disclose whether their activities contribute to land degradation, desertification, or soil sealing, and if they have operations impacting threatened species. This enables stakeholders to assess environmental vulnerabilities and biodiversity risks directly associated with the business model.
Under ESRS 2 IRO-1, companies are required to outline their processes for identifying and assessing biodiversity and ecosystem impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities. Key requirements include:
Under ESRS E4-2, companies must disclose policies for managing material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities associated with biodiversity and ecosystems. This includes specifying how these policies address:
Additionally, companies must confirm if they have specific policies covering:
These disclosures provide transparency on a company's commitment to sustainable ecosystem management and responsible resource use across operations and supply chains.
Under ESRS E4-3, companies are required to disclose their biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions and the resources allocated to implement them. This requirement provides insight into how the company’s actions support biodiversity and ecosystem policy objectives and targets.
Key elements to disclose include:
{{custom-cta}}
Under ESRS E4-4, companies must disclose the biodiversity and ecosystem-related targets they have set. This requirement helps stakeholders understand how these targets support biodiversity policies and address material impacts, dependencies, risks, and opportunities.
Key elements of the disclosure include:
Under ESRS E4-5, companies must report metrics to assess their material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem changes. This includes:
These metrics provide insight into the company’s biodiversity impacts, addressing both direct operational influences and ecosystem health changes.
Under ESRS E4-6, companies must disclose the anticipated financial effects of material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities. This disclosure is intended to provide insight into how these environmental factors may impact a company’s financial position, performance, and cash flows over short-, medium-, and long-term horizons.
Key elements of the disclosure include:
This structured disclosure under E4-6 ensures stakeholders can understand the potential financial implications of biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities, enhancing transparency in the company’s approach to environmental sustainability.
To effectively implement ESRS E4, companies need to conduct a double materiality assessment focused - among other things - on biodiversity and ecosystem-related issues. This is built around the four sub-topics of ESRS E4:
For each sub-topic, evaluate whether your company has identified any impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs) associated with it. Assessing the materiality of these IROs will help determine if ESRS E4 qualifies as a material topic. Below is an overview of each sub-topic to guide your assessment of IROs in these areas.
Direct drivers of impact loss: Identify specific business activities that directly cause biodiversity loss, such as land use changes, pollution, resource extraction, or emissions. Assess how these drivers affect local and global biodiversity, particularly within the company’s operational and supply chain footprint.
Impact on the state of species: Evaluate how company operations impact species diversity and population health, especially for endangered or vulnerable species. This includes analyzing habitat disturbance, mortality risks, and species displacement due to business activities.
Impact on the extent and condition of ecosystems: Assess the effect of operations on the size, quality, and connectivity of ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, and marine environments. This includes tracking changes in ecosystem integrity, degradation, or fragmentation caused by business processes.
Impact and dependencies on ecosystem services: Identify the ecosystem services the company relies on, such as pollination, water purification, and climate regulation, and evaluate how its activities impact these services. Understanding dependencies can help the company mitigate risks associated with the loss or degradation of these services.
By focusing on these sub-topics, companies can prioritize biodiversity and ecosystem issues most material to their operations and develop effective strategies for managing their impact and dependencies on natural resources.
To meet ESRS E4-2, companies should establish policies focused on biodiversity protection, ecosystem restoration, and degradation prevention. These policies should outline how the company addresses biodiversity impacts, risks, and opportunities, and include commitments to avoid, minimize, and remediate harm across its operations and value chain.
To comply with ESRS E4-3, companies should develop an action plan detailing specific steps and resource allocations to support biodiversity conservation and ecosystem health. This plan should include targeted actions such as habitat restoration, species protection initiatives, and measures to minimize biodiversity impacts across operations. Key actions may involve implementing the mitigation hierarchy—avoidance, minimization, restoration, and, where necessary, offsets—to address biodiversity impacts effectively. The action plan should also specify funding, timeframes, and responsible teams, ensuring that resources are dedicated to achieving measurable outcomes. Incorporating local and indigenous knowledge, as well as nature-based solutions, can enhance these efforts. By outlining clear actions and resource commitments, companies provide transparency and demonstrate their proactive approach to biodiversity and ecosystem management.
To align with ESRS E4-4, companies should establish clear, measurable targets for biodiversity preservation and ecosystem restoration. These targets should address key issues such as reducing habitat disturbance, enhancing ecosystem connectivity, increasing protected green areas, or restoring degraded ecosystems.
Targets should be specific and trackable, linked to the company’s biodiversity policies and aligned with frameworks like the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework or the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.
To comply with ESRS E4-5, companies should regularly monitor and report on biodiversity and ecosystem metrics to assess their impacts and track progress toward conservation goals. Key metrics might include land-use changes, habitat restoration, species population trends, and ecosystem health indicators such as connectivity or resilience.
These metrics should be tied to the company’s material impacts and dependencies, addressing biodiversity-sensitive areas, threatened species, or critical ecosystem services.
To align with ESRS E4-6, companies should assess and disclose the financial implications of biodiversity-related risks and opportunities, focusing on how ecosystem changes or conservation efforts may affect their financial performance, position, and cash flows.
This includes evaluating risks such as biodiversity loss, resource scarcity, or regulatory changes, as well as opportunities like sustainable resource use or ecosystem restoration initiatives. Companies should quantify these financial effects, where possible, in monetary terms or provide qualitative insights if quantification is not feasible.
Disclosures should specify the critical assumptions and timeframes considered in the analysis, offering a clear view of how biodiversity impacts are integrated into financial planning and decision-making.
To enhance compliance with ESRS E4 requirements, organizations should implement advanced tools and software for efficient data collection, analysis, and reporting on water and marine resources.
By automating data processes and integrating analytics, organizations can make informed, proactive decisions that improve water management practices and support sustainability goals, ultimately simplifying the reporting process and enhancing transparency. Coolset helps users achieve CSRD compliance by simplifying the reporting process and enhancing transparency in reporting data points. Try out our software below, or book a demo here.
{{product-tour-injectable}}
Our sustainability experts share best practices and break down regulations.