Receive weekly email reports, guides and templates. Includes topics from CSRD compliance, decarbonization playbooks up to certifications and communication.
The Omnibus proposal is set to change the ESG reporting landscape – as over 40.000 businesses that previously had to report on Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) may no longer fall under its scope.
This comes at a time when thousands of companies have already put their ESG efforts in motion. If ever, now is the time to take advantage of the momentum and leverage the internal and external wins linked to ESG (like risk mapping, future-proofing and validating long-term strategies).
While industry leaders and investors alike agree that the European Union should halt its deregulation drive, companies are now looking for a working alternative. That’s where the sustainability reporting standard for non-listed micro, small and medium enterprises (VSME) comes in.
It’s a voluntary, streamlined ESG reporting framework. Even if you’re no longer legally required to report, ESG transparency remains a key competitive advantage as expectations from stakeholders continue to rise.
The Omnibus proposal is reshaping the ESG reporting landscape. With mandatory CSRD requirements loosening, thousands of companies now face a choice: stay the course with CSRD, transition to the VSME, or scale back ESG reporting altogether.
The first market signals are clear: most companies are sticking to structured reporting. Organizations competing on a European or global level recognize that a level playing field drives competitiveness. Between companies slightly above or below the CSRD threshold, those taking a proactive approach to sustainability will have the market advantage. With audit requirements removed, costs for CSRD alignment have come down, making it a logical choice for those already on track.
For companies that struggled with CSRD timelines or lacked the scale to support the full framework, VSME provides a right-sized alternative. The framework keeps the core principles of CSRD but removes unnecessary complexity. It signals maturity, reinforces credibility with banks and investors, and ensures a business remains aligned with evolving expectations from customers and partners.
Companies now fall into three categories:
Today, we’re diving into VSME — what it is, why it matters, and how it strengthens businesses both organizationally and competitively for the future.
The voluntary standard is a flexible and practical ESG reporting framework designed specifically for SMEs. Developed by EFRAG, the standard provides a proportional and simplified approach to sustainability reporting — aligned with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) of the CSRD but tailored to the needs and capabilities of smaller businesses.
The voluntary nature of the VSME standard makes it an ideal choice for companies that still want to measure, track, and report their ESG performance, even as the scope of mandatory CSRD requirements has been reduced under the Omnibus proposal.
The VSME standard is designed for any business that wants to track and report on ESG performance, regardless of whether they are legally required to do so. While originally developed for SMEs, the framework is now applicable and recommended to a broader range of companies that seek a practical, proportional, and voluntary approach to ESG reporting.
Your company should consider using the VSME standard if:
The VSME framework offers two ESG reporting options: the Basic Module and the Comprehensive Module. The Basic Module covers core ESG metrics like energy use, emissions, workforce composition, and anti-corruption — ideal for a streamlined, proportional approach. The Comprehensive Module builds on this, adding disclosures on strategy, climate transition, human rights, and sector-specific data, making it suitable for businesses seeking greater transparency for investors and banks. Completion of the Basic Module is required before opting for the Comprehensive Module.
Good to know: The VSME incorporates many elements of the CSRD. Companies that have already completed a double materiality assessment under the ESRS and/or have gathered data for the ESRS data points, are very well positioned to report on the VSME standard. The most advanced tools can help streamline this transition by automatically mapping and prefilling progress across these interoperable frameworks — whether you’ve tracked your ESG data within or outside the software.
Best for: Companies looking for a lightweight but effective ESG report—ideal for businesses that want to meet stakeholder expectations without extensive reporting requirements.
The Basic Module includes around 50 data points that focus on essential ESG disclosures, covering the core aspects of sustainability performance. It is designed to be practical and proportional, ensuring that companies can comply without overburdening their operations.
Best for: Companies that want to provide a detailed, investor-ready ESG report, particularly those seeking financing, investor confidence, or a strong sustainability profile for large corporate clients.
The Comprehensive Module contains around 100 data points (compared to 1.100 in CSRD), and expands on the Basic Module, adding more in-depth insights on sustainability strategy, risk management, and sector-specific ESG considerations.
Investors, banks, and large business partners still expect sustainability data, and having a structured ESG report helps you build trust, secure financing, and future-proof your organization. The VSME standard provides a manageable, actionable framework that allows businesses to report on ESG performance without excessive complexity.
To guide this process, Coolset has launched a dedicated and modular VSME module: starting with the Basic framework and extending into Comprehensive. It’s designed to streamline reporting while setting you up with an end-to-end sustainability management platform for both current and future ESG needs.
Want to learn more? Find a time with our team.
Note: This article is based on the original CSRD and ESRS. Following the release of the Omnibus proposal on February 26, some information may no longer be accurate. We are currently reviewing and updating this article to reflect the latest reulatory developments. In the meantime, we recommend reading our Omnibus deep-dive for up-to-date insights on reporting requirements.